from what i see, it is a very standard action revenge movie. it begins with a horrible insult. it ends with payback. at the same time, it's done in a very cool, if not icy objective style. there's no attempt to make the torture seem anything other than it is, which is ugly and brutal. there is no attempt to soft pedal or glorify. the s.e.a.l.s. put extra bullets into people who aren't even armed. it seems to me despite their protest to the country, there's no way you can interpret this as a movie that is anything but means justifying ends ugly as they are. guy did something bad to us and we got him. >> aside from the message of the movie and it has genuinely gotten good reviews. does it have the sin macinemati elements of good movie making? >> it's not a documentary, it's a movie. the reason we're having this conversation is they have said, they have claimed that it is a form of journalism. therefore it can be judged as a form of journalism. >> is your view influenced by the fact that you were unpaid by the film. they asked me to come and critique it and i did and i said some o